You are browsing the archive for hunger.

Avatar of Sarah

by Sarah

Young people are hungry for a place at the table!

January 23, 2013 in Economics, International Development, Youth

Enough Food for Everyone IF

Enough Food IF launch at Somerset House, London (23rd January 2013)

More than half the world’s population is under 25. Yet we – the young people of the world – are significantly under-represented in decision-making at all levels, from local government to global politics.

Internationally, 87% of young people surveyed by Restless Development feel that they have a role to play in shaping global development priorities. However, the majority of these young people say they are unsure how they can have a real say in development debates.

Here in the UK, the majority of young people are interested in politics [1]. However, 56% of 17 to 24-year-olds were not registered to vote in the last general election (according to the Electoral Commission). Perhaps this is because only 8% of young people believe that politicians care about their views [2]… How many young people do you think David Cameron has really listened to about their opinions on the EU, for instance?

In the run-up to the G8 summit to be hosted by the UK in June 2013, more than 100 NGOs are uniting in a campaign to end world hunger. This is good, important, and necessary: IF we don’t act, then 937 million young people’s life chances will be permanently damaged by childhood hunger by 2025.

We at Generation Development agree with these 100 NGOs that aid, land, tax and transparency are all crucial issues in the campaign to end world hunger. But young people are not just hungry for food. We have fire in our bellies, and we are hungry for change.

The dinner table is all well and good, but young people must also have a proper seat at the decision-making table. For too long, development has been seen as something that is done to or for young people, rather than with and by young people. We will inherit the decisions that are being made without consulting us. So we dream of a world where global leaders listen to the voices of young people across the world, and where young people can shape the future of international development.

If you share this dream, then tell your friends about Generation Development, and watch this space to learn how you can be part of a global conversation about young people’s needs, wishes and goals.

WE ARE: Generation Development


[1] 63% of the 1000 18-year-olds surveyed by the BBC in 2012 said they were interested in politics.

[2] A poll by the Children’s Society found that only 8% of 11 to 25-year-olds believe that politicians care about young people’s views.

LinkedInShare

Video Blog! The MDGs post-2015

August 5, 2011 in Guest Author, International Development, MDG 1 (Poverty & Hunger), MDG 2 (Education), MDG 3 (Gender Equality), MDG 4 (Child Mortality), MDG 5 (Maternal Health), MDG 6 (Health), MDG 7 (Sustainability), MDG 8 (Global Partnership), MDGs

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3p2VLTowAA&playnext=1&list=PLE7DFB0DB1151E209]

The current MDGs were based on figures from 1990, with a target for 15 years in the future. The World has changed a lot since then, the population has surged and there has been mass migration from rural to urban areas.

LMICs are no longer one and the same; development in Asia has soared, leaving the majority of Sub-Saharan Africa trailing behind, skewing results for poverty eradication and health provision.

After 2015, where will we be? Current statistics show that many of the targets may not be reached, and different areas will reach certain targets disproportionately to others. A local based approach for the future may be the way forward; we are no longer in a situation where inequality doesn’t matter.

Reports on where we are and where to go next include:

1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNsLF9-9l5U]

46% of the population in LMIC in 1990 lived on less than $1 a day, this decreased to 27% in 2009. For the target to reduce extreme poverty by a half, this seems to be on target however:

  • As a result of the global economic crisis 16% people in 2009 were undernourished, a rise from 14% in 2005.
  • Most people now live in urban areas, compared to rural areas in the 1990s posing different challenges to those that were faced when the goals were set.
  • The majority of poor people now live in MIC, is a HIC donor focus on poverty alleviation the right one?

 2. Achieve universal primary education:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jieco-43WNI&feature=fvwrel]

Worldwide coverage was 90% in 2009 up from 84% in 1990. In LMICs there was an increase to 89% from 82%.

Those that are out of school tend to be in the poorest quartile within their countries. If this target is not achieved by 2015 then a focus on the social circumstances of this population group may assist in alleviating this issue.

3. Promote gender equality and empower women:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSILGxaJa0Y&playnext=1&list=PL6F6EA8D2C6D6C3E4]

  • The World as a whole is a lot more aware of the importance that women play in society and this is being shown in the male:female ratio in education. In 2009 the male to female ratio for those in primary education was 100:96 up from 100:91 in 1990.
  • Employment is still a major area in which improvement needs to be made.

 4. Reduce child mortality:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBrlwzzhsqs]

The majority of deaths of Under-5s are preventable and a third are attributable to under-nutrition.

The 2015 target is 30 deaths per 1000 live births; in 2009 throughout all LMICs the Under-5 mortality rate was 72 per 1000 a decrease from 1990 when there were an average of 100 deaths per 1000 live births.

  • Focus on other MDG targets will improve this as a secondary measure, as more people are able to afford healthcare and education is improved.

5. Improve Maternal Health:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76W3AdJtTRo&playnext=1&list=PLE82DDE19F41FA920]

Haemorrhage accounts for 35% of all maternal deaths, a preventable cause, easily improved by the presence of skilled-birth attendants. In 2009 63% of births in LMICs were attended by skilled birth-attendants and increase from 53% in 1990.

Education of women and empowerment will ultimately improve this situation, as increased knowledge of the risks will improve attendance to ante-natal clinics and specialist services.

6. Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEicDJ_aiME&playnext=1&list=PLE82DDE19F41FA920]

  • Progress is being made with HIV; fewer people are becoming newly infected (around 2.7 million in 2008) and people are living longer. 42% in LMIC in 2008 with HIV/AIDS receive ARVs, up from 16% in 2005.
  • Global awareness about malaria has increased and subsequently the use of nets in all areas has increased. However, poverty still determines whether or not a child with malaria gets treatment.
  • With TB being conjunct with HIV infection, rates are only recently being to slow. Globally infections were 139 per 100,000 in 2008.

7. Ensure environmental sustainability:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix-1XFQDlUU]

CO2 emissions are rising worldwide leading to increases in climate catastrophes and desertification of once arable farming land are affecting the fight against all MDGs. Future targets need to incorporate the issues of climate change without diverting effort away from poverty alleviation. Those most affected by climate catastrophes need to have the ability to be more resilient to reduce the need for gross emergency aid.

8. Develop a global partnership for development:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXDDNFLDiFw&feature=channel_video_title]

The UN target for aid donation from HICs is 0.7% of GDP, only 5 countries reach this currently. However alleviation of debt burdens, preferential tariffs for imported goods from LDCs alongside duty free imports for products from LMICs has helped to improve international trading.

Aid driven targets may no longer be the solution for sustainable development and a focus on decent work and labour standards will help to further development globally.

Amelia Cutts: [email protected]

Amelia is a final year medical student at Southampton, UK. She has an interest in health politics, especially health inequalities, and have been actively involved in Medsin and related campaigns over  her time at medical school. 

LinkedInShare

Famine and the Failure of MDG1

July 23, 2011 in Economics, MDGs, Youth

“We can never address these problems through emergency response. We have to solve these problems through prevention.”

Jeffrey Sachs, 19th July 2011

Millenium Development Goal 1 aims to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, with target 1.C stating that we should halve the proportion of people who suffer from hunger between 1990 and 2015. We are only 4 years away from that goal. The 2011 Millennium Development Goals Report, produced by the United Nations to evaluate progress towards the goals states, with classic understatement, that “based on current trends, sub-Saharan Africa will be unable to meet the hunger-reduction target by 2015.” Despite overall reductions in poverty levels hunger levels have plateaued at around 16% and so the UN decided to “undertake a comprehensive review of the causes behind this apparent discrepancy to better inform hunger-reduction policies in the future.” 

From : http://kenilworthgeography.blogspot.com/

Patently, this is too little too late. At the moment I am writing this, and the moment you are reading it, 12,000,000 people are starving to death in the region of east Africa known as the Horn of Africa, taking in Sudan, South Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Uganda, Ethiopia and Kenya.

Famine is not an overnight event. Somalia has suffered two years of a significant lack of rain and international food prices have been rising towards crisis level. In 2008 Josette Sheeran, head of the UN’s World Food Programme, warned this region was heading for disaster in an article in the Economist, describing it as “a silent tsunami.” The article is a call to arms to find solutions to the complex economic, political and environmental factors building towards a humanitarian disaster. Yet the international community, facing an unprecedented financial crisis, sat back and waited until the cachectic bodies and bloated bellies of starving children once again flooded our TV screens. Somalia faces an additional synergistic factor creating an even worse situation there, with the Al-Shabab rebel group continuing to prevent aid agencies from providing support.

Whether you blame the environment and climate change, economics and aid, war and violence, or a combination of these toxic factors, this is ultimately a man made disaster and should have been prevented. MDG1 may have focused attention on the world’s starving people and encouraged the development of strategies for the prevention and relief of hunger, however if an entire region of the world is left to starve to death we have failed.

I have no doubt that an enormous aid programme will be launched, and the $300 – $500 million needed to provide food assistance will arrive. However this is not a sustainable situation. It is a band-aid on an amputated leg. This situation also demonstrates the absurd uselessness of the Famine Early Warning System if there is no motivation or drive to reduce the ultimate causes of famine.

We, both as members of the international community and simply as fellow humans, should be ashamed.

We, as youth and the future of international development, must to better.

We must ensure that any international development framework that emerges post-2015 ensures that a famine, such as the one currently ravaging the Horn of Africa, does not happen on our watch. 

In solidarity with my African brothers and sisters.

Tim

[email protected]

LinkedInShare